The EU budget: A waste of money? - October 1 2008


SenSent to the Solihull Times and Sutton Coldfield News

During summer, behind the scenes, the EU’s draft budget for 2009 was engineered, with minimum time for genuine scrutiny.

‘Highlights’: The budget is £116 billion, 3.15% above last year. Communications budget (promoting itself) is £171.6m, small beer compared to the £1billion for organisations actively promoting European integration including the European Movement and many others.

The lion's share goes to the European Commission, £95 billion. Of this, £35.75 billion goes to Agriculture and Fisheries. (The UK pays £374m in agricultural levies, more than any other member) £500m for fisheries initiatives, purchasing International Fishing Agreements with non-EU countries, allowing Spanish and Portuguese fishermen to plunder the world’s waters. Usually governments pocket this money leaving local fishermen, who can’t possibly compete with sophisticated European competitors, without compensation.
Administration and EU integration budget gets a 5% increase to £64.2 billion, similar rises to the last three years. The real cost of administration is carefully hidden by the creation of a series of quangos, budgeted separately.

Organisations like the European Agency for Health & Safety at Work (£10.83m) and the European Foods Safety Agency (£58.3m). Too many others to list.
The generous 2009 EU staff pensions contribution is £970m. The EU budget also includes measures that are technically illegal as the Lisbon Treaty has yet to be ratified and has been rejected by the people of Ireland.

Finally, the budget for the European Parliament, Brussels and Strasbourg, is £1.25 billion. These figures have to be approved but only UKIP will vote against, so smile!

t to the Solihull Times and Sutton Coldfield News

The EU saved between 3 and 4 million euros when in August a 10 tonne portion of ceiling collapsed over the UKIP area of the plenary chamber in Strasbourg. A French MEP claims 300 people could have died if it had fallen during a session. A UKIP official said “It was not us!”

In 1992 the EU Summit, chaired by John Major, legally confirmed the use of the Strasbourg parliament building twelve times a year, giving France a veto over its closure.

The beautiful city of Strasbourg suffered a financial blow due to this collapse but the travelling circus will return in October to fill all the hotel rooms, bars and restaurants.

Each month this circus of 784 MEPs (clowns?) and about 4000 staff (jugglers?) have to find their way there (not easy) to a building not used for 317 days in a year.

Each MEP has an official visitors’ quota of 100 per year, each receives a subsidy on visiting the parliament. ( more than 270 euros to visit Strasbourg from here.)

If you and a friend are interested in visiting (both over 14 years and from this area) please write to the editor. A draw on 25 October 2008 will select a pair to visit the Strasbourg parliament on 25 March 2009 as my visitors, the pair will be given 540 + euros in total on inspecting the parliament and listening to an explanation. Transport and accommodation to be organised by the visitors but I can give suggestions/alternatives.

Mike Nattrass West Midlands UKIP MEP