|
| Attitude? - August 20 2008 |
Sent to the Solihull Times and Sutton Coldfield News
Opposition to EU control comes not just from the
UK’s outspoken UKIP but from like-minded
European MEPs wanting some form of self-determination
or “Independence.” In the EU parliament,
UKIP joined forces with those seeking some form
of freedom to run their own affairs. The “No” votes
in France and Holland and the Irish “No” to
the Lisbon Treaty clearly illustrate this resistance
and UKIP was the only UK party to financially support
those campaigns.
This week, we hear Dutch train improvements will
be restricted until 2020 because of EU interference.
Erik Meijer, Dutch MEP, says plans for faster connections
from 2011 on the new line to Schiphol etc etc are
under threat. “I want the EU to explain on
what grounds they are attempting to block these
quite limited improvements to the Dutch rail system.” “The
EU system costs €220 million a year, and the
Dutch system 23 million. So I'm asking for some
explanation as to why they prefer the former.”
In the UK, directives on restricting Post Office
funding and opening the Royal Mail up to competition
provide only a small example of EU control. Even
our border monitoring system of numbers of people
entering the UK from the EU conflicts with the
EU ‘open borders’ policy and this week
an EU official said: “The UK needs to change
its attitude.” So as far as I am concerned,
he can go and eat his hat, in which case it would
be his ‘at- e-chewed.’
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |